https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69362
--- Comment #10 from Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #9) > My reading of RFC 4918 is if we have a status code for baz it should be 424. > > Quoting from RFC 2119: > SHOULD NOT This phrase, or the phrase "NOT RECOMMENDED" mean that > there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the > particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full > implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed > before implementing any behavior described with this label. > > If we have valid reasons to include a status code it should be 424. My > preference is for your counter proposal to add a comment and continue to > omit the status for parent resources in this case. This is what my counter-proposal does, not behavioral change, just add better docs. That's it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
