I thought changes were going into trunk and then when applicable,
backported to 6.0.x.
Since this change is only writing warning messages. It seems appropriate
that it can remain in 6.0.x.
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
this should have been done in trunk, way too big change for a minor
dot release upgrade
I suggest we move it there, revert in 6.0, and if it works well in
trunk, we backport
Personally, I will not be working in trunk, which is your toy branch. I
considered this change to be appropriate to be committed in 6.0.x. Are
you vetoing this commit ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
