DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43228>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43228 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 22:09 ------- Created an attachment (id=20738) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20738&action=view) benchmark results with a simpler servlet Hi Remy, Did you mean that a significant overhead of HelloExampleServlet is ResourceBundle.getBundle() or concatenating strings? Anyway I did tests with a simpler Servlet. testname, rps, 99% tile, cpu original, 6777.25 [#/sec], 75 [ms], 86.90 [%] patch, 6873.97 [#/sec], 60 [ms], 86.29 [%] And I did same tests with Keep-Alive. testname, rps, 99% tile, cpu original, 10137.90 [#/sec], 60 [ms], 97.32 [%] patch, 10130.51 [#/sec], 63 [ms], 96.46 [%] As a result, I could not see the overhead of using AtomicInteger on Tomcat. However, this issue is not so serious problem because countAllocated is not used on other places and we have already gotten a workalound, so I consent this issue is WONTFIX. I will never reopen it. :-) thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
