Hi, I vote +1 :-)
Peter Am 26.09.2007 um 16:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I'd like to call a vote on acceptance of the above methodology, as crafted and fine-tuned by Costin and myself. It is worthwhile to note that, really, these are the typical ASF methods, but with some "grainy" aspects better defined. In essence, some typical "niceties" are now mandated (changes, even in CTR, which affect the API, must be brought up first to gauge community approval). [ ] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns as well as the problems which started this whole thing. [ ] 0. Whatever. [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: The vote will run for 96 hours instead of the normal 72 because of the weekend. Only binding votes will be counted, but non-binding votes will be used to address wider concern/acceptance of the proposal.Looks like the 96 hours are up, and the tally is: +1: jim, yoav, tim, remy, costin, filip, mark, mladen, jean-frederic, rainerNot Sure: Peter followed up: "I agree with Remy: We must find a processthat really work normally quick and can handle conflicts fair." Henri +1'ed Peter's post. So I am not sure if Peter actually cast a vote or simply made a comment and I'm not sure if Henri +1'ed the proposal or Peter's comment or both. -1: null set As such, the vote passes!! We can now give ourselves a pat on the back for resolving this and start implementing the changes we approved... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
