Guys - this isn't how you use voting ... if there is an incorrectly
branded file in svn, it doesn't matter which branch it is on.
It's commit then review; review r598412 already, and either justify
it or revert the original change. It's not subject to a backport
debate. Citation of whatever justification exists to remove a
license/notice is absolutely mandatory in the svn commit history.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: billbarker
Date: Tue Nov 27 02:54:45 2007
New Revision: 598587
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=598587&view=rev
Log:
Adding my objection
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=598587&r1=598586&r2=598587&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Tue Nov 27 02:54:45 2007
@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
* Fix another license issue
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=598412&view=rev
+1: markt, fhanik, pero
- -1:
+ -1: billbarker It is clear that simply making a copy doesn't release you from the original license.
+ It is clear that Sun ownes the license on these files, and that will never change.
* Add get/set methods for properties in the Tcp Failure detector
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/tcpfaildet-getset.patch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
