DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-07 00:54 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > The file contains sticky_session_force=0 (False/Off). > Can you confirm, that the file belongs to the startup test which logged > sticky_session_force=True, i.e. it's timestamp and PID are OK? I want to > exclude > the possibility, that we are talking about a stale file. > > I'll now think about ways, how the wrong information could get into the shm > file. I have just: - stopped the Apache processes. - cleared out all [APACHE_INSTALL]/logs/jk.shm.* files. - Checked that the workers.properties is configured with sticky_session_force=True. - Started the Apache process up again. - found the files: - [APACHE_INSTALL]/logs/jk.shm.3597.lock - [APACHE_INSTALL]/logs/jk.shm.3597 - checked the Apache process and it was 3597. - I will attach jk.shm.3597 file to the ticket too. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
