Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Well, obviously the new code is not equivalent to the old one, because Long.TYPE and other TYPE constants are the classes for the primitive types (long, int etc.), and those are not an instance of java.lang.Number.
Yep my bad. I mis-read what my IDE was telling me. That explains some of the original code but not all of it. Any ideas?
Mark PS Better patch to follow shortly. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
