On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Sorry, just discovered the problem. > > > > The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243. > > I'll know next time... > > > Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have > to use hexadecimal format and prefix the id with "0x" (note zero, not the > letter O) >
Rather poor UI, given that they tend to be displayed without the 0x prefix... > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
