https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47124
--- Comment #6 from Marc Guillemot <mguille...@yahoo.fr> 2009-05-05 06:12:03 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Isn't it even more efficient if one committer (you?) just rename the files > > and > > commit the changes? > > Depends how you measure efficiency. It would be less work for me just to > review > a set of proposed changes. if you know an easy way to generate the set of SVN commands, I'm interested. Otherwise. due to the very small number of files impacted, it's better if you do it directly. I've already provided a patch for that but you haven't applied it. > > this was in the proposed patch. Should I upload an other one? > > There was a lot to the patch. Separating out the junit task (and checking that > it still applies to the latest trunk) would be useful. > > Re-opening so this doesn't get forgotten. ok, I'll submit an other one just with this features -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
