Hi Konstantin,

On 17.07.2009 12:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2009/7/17  <rj...@apache.org>:
>> Modified:
>>    tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
>>
>>   Ported from 6.0 (mainly from Mladen's rev.791699)
>>   
>> http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/patches/2009-07-17_tc55_native_install_791699.patch
>> -  +1: kkolinko
>> +  +1: kkolinko, rjung
>>   -1:
>> +  rjung: Please change all occurences of "i64" to "ia64". AFAIK ia64 is the 
>> official notation.
> 
> Thank you for the vote.
> 
> I do not plan changing the name. We already voted for these names when
> the patch was proposed for TC 6.0 (committed in rev.791699), and some
> discussion was before that.

Sorry, I missed that and I actually voted +1 on that revision, so I'll
shut up and live with i64. Pretty sure sometime in the future I will
have forgotten the discussion and stumble again over the unusual choice
of name and might ask about it again.

> The only place where the name is important is this line in tomcat.nsi:
> +  StrCmp $0 "IA64" 0 +3

Sure. It was more of an issue for us working with the directories and
file names etc. giving them reasonable names in den land.

> It is also present as a subdirectory of /bin in the *.zip and *.tgz
> distributives.

Yes, and that's why I was putting focus on the testing topic. I saw,
that the tomcat6.exe file was put in a new dir and wanted to make sure,
it's use is adjusted accordingly. Now I see, that the nsi changes cope
with that. All fine, sorrry for the noise.

> If we backport the second part of rev.791699 - the separate zips for
> different windows CPU architectures, there wouldn't be such
> subdirectories, but "i64" will be in the name of the archive. That
> name will be easier to fix.   I plan to prepare the backport and
> propose it once this patch is applied. I think that will be in 4
> hours. We better come to some decision before that.

In this case, name to be seen by users, I have some strong feelings for
ia64 instead of i64. I thought that's the standard used for the Itanium
architecture. Is there any official or pseudo-official of i64 in the
wild? Short googling didn't reveal anything useful on i64 and Itanium.

> I understand, that we have 9 hours left before the "12 pm MST"
> deadline that Filip stated.

> I already tested it on my 32-bit WinXP system, and it builds, installs
> and runs OK.
> 
> I plan to also test it on Vista 64-bit (x86-64), but I have yet to
> reach that place.
> 
> I do not have an IA64 system.

Yeah, maybe Mladen can jump in, but I think Itanium support for TC 6 is
not that critical, so we can go a slightly higher risk of breaking things.

Thanks a lot for your explanation, and sorry that I didn't first read
the original patch.

Regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to