On 25.07.2009 16:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2009/7/25 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: >> On 25.07.2009 01:44, sebb wrote: >>> On 24/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <devli...@hanik.com> wrote: >>> >>> The server.xml file in the EXE is different from the one in the bin >>> file and appears to be an old version. >>> >>> Likewise, the file tomcat-users.xml looks wrong - it says that there >>> is no user with the manager role, yet it contains the following entry: >>> >>> <user name="admin" password="" roles="admin,manager" /> >> IMHO this would be a release blocker. >> >> Of course if it is only a packaging problem, we can still fix for 28. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> > > No, it is a known feature. It is there for I do not know how many releases. It > is observed by those who clicked through the EXE installer without paying > attention. One page of the installer asks you about user name and password, > and you end up with > <user name="admin" password="" roles="admin,manager" /> > in your tomcat-users.xml, as those are the default values. > > I consider that a serious problem, and would like at least to make > that installation > step optional, but I have not yet found time for it. > > Patches are welcome.
Thanks for clarification Konstantin. I haven't used the installer for a long time. If it's no regression, then it's no blocker. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
