On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is: >> [X] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] Stable >> >> 6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before >> next week and before enough votes. > > Checked src.zip, src.tar.gz, zip, widows-x64.zip & exe > > MD5s good > Signatures good, key in web of trust > > Neither the src.zip nor the src.tar.gz matches the tag.
+++ Index: build.properties.default =================================================================== --- build.properties.default (revision 893580) +++ build.properties.default (working copy) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ version.minor=0 version.build=0 version.patch=0 -version=6.0-snapshot +version=6.0.22 # ----- Default Base Path for Dependent Packages ----- # Please note this path must be absolute, not relative, +++ Correct? > A number of > binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been > modified. Further investigation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't > quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for > 6.0.x and 5.5.x I voted it :-) Happy New year Jean-Frederic > > Mark > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
