Author: markt
Date: Tue Mar 9 12:01:45 2010
New Revision: 920817
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920817&view=rev
Log:
Withdraw proposal. I think the spec could stand some clarification but the
current impl is compliant.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=920817&r1=920816&r2=920817&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Tue Mar 9 12:01:45 2010
@@ -114,15 +114,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
+1: kkolinko
-1:
-* Follow up for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
- Make handling of isELIgnored and isDeferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral consistent
- This is *NOT* required for spec compliance
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920110&view=rev
- +1: markt, jfclere
- -1: kkolinko: JSP 2.0 spec chapter "Backwards Compatibility with JSP 1.2"
(page xx (20 of 478))
- does not mention it. So I think it is against the spec. See r920055
thread on d...@.
- I reverted it in trunk in r920608.
-
* Improve log messages when a potential leak is detected by including the name
of the offending context
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=920298
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
