The current setup of the .project and .classpath files works good for
many years.
I think it was helpfull for user of the src distribution, also use the
correct eclipse setup.
The license issue is really bad and we must fixit! We can do that with
a little ant task.
To move .project and .classpath to temp files.
+1
Can we use eclipse.project.default and eclispe.classpath.default as
names?
Peter
Am 27.04.2010 um 09:18 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
2010/4/26 <p...@apache.org>:
Author: pero
Date: Mon Apr 26 10:46:01 2010
New Revision: 937993
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937993&view=rev
Log:
Include .project and .classpath files to src distribution.
s. http://ant.apache.org/manual/dirtasks.html#defaultexcludes to
not include scm files!
The ".project" and ".classpath" files do not have ASL header. I do not
think that we should include them in the src distribution how they
are.
Eclipse IDE overwrites them from time to time, so keeping a header in
them looks like a lot of work, e.g. we did that once already:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=746405
One way to deal with it could be to make a copy of them under
different names, e.g.
".classpath.tmpl.xml, ".project.tmpl.xml", and ignore existing
".classpath" and ".project":
http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#ignore-commit
What do you think?
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
