> In this case, both threads will > continue running the function with ?replaced? bit turned on and the oldValue > of both thread will point to the same location. This means that the value of > the first thread that did the put operation will not be treated as a value > that was replaced. > > Could you please let me know whether you consider this as a bug?
Is it any different than if two threads invoke the operation serially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
