Retagged, rerolled and reuploaded... ;) On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > >> 2011/2/7 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval. >>> The candidates binaries are available here: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/ >>> >>> According to the release process, the 5.5.33 build corresponding to the >>> tag TOMCAT_5_5_33 [1] is: >>> >>> [ ] Broken >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [ ] Beta >>> [ ] Stable >> >> Runs good, but as Rainer already noted, build.properties.default both >> in the src bundles and in the svn tag says that it is 5.5.32 >> >> Thus whoever will try to build it from the sources will get wrong >> version number. >> >> >> I think it would be better to re-tag (or update the >> build.properties.default inside the tag) and to rebuild the packages. >> Is it possible? >> > > Don't see why we need to though... Isn't the whole idea of a default > file something that doesn't need to change? > > I'm fine w/ retagging and rolling though. > >> I updated build.properties.default in tc5.5.x/trunk in r1068276 >> >> Best regards, >> Konstantin Kolinko >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
