https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52028
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2011-10-28 17:52:55 UTC --- Created attachment 27861 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27861 v1 patch for discussion I have started to look at this and it looks doable. port=0 works for all connectors for 64-bit Windows. The problem is with MBean names, JMX MBean registration and logging info. The port number is not available at the point where the JMX registration occurs. If bindOnInit="false", the port number may change multiple times during the life of the connector. With multiple connectors using port="0" there will be a naming clash as the connectors need to be registered before the the ports are known. I see two options. 1. Use auto-1, auto-2 instead of the port number in the JMX names (with a static, thread-safe counter). 2. Re-register the connector and related components when the port number changes. I'm leaning towards one as it is a heck of a lot simpler. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
