https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52697
--- Comment #2 from Jörgen Rydenius <ryden...@gmail.com> 2012-02-17 23:45:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > But logically, I think it would make more sense recycling the outputBuffer > > the last thing. > > No it doesn't. Thank you very much Mark for your elaborate reply. I buy your reasoning in all cases but one: you say it does not make any sense to call outputBuffer.recycle() after outputStream.clear(). Clearing the output stream after recycling the outputBuffer opens a window where a misbehaving application can affect the already recycled outputBuffer. Clearing the outputStream first would on the other hand disconnect the outputBuffer from the application before recycling it, thus making it impossible for a misbehaving application to do something stupid with it. That would in my humble opinion be a robustness improvement. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
