So, I’ll file a bug about this, but I wanted to get a general feel from the
list first. This happens in both Tomcat 6 and 7 (haven’t looked at 5.5),
but I’ve only included the Tomcat 7 log info here for succinctness.



When running Tomcat as a service under Windows, if you mess up the Java
Virtual Machine path in the service configurator, it defaults to the
JAVA_HOME JRE, which I suppose is okay (but can wreak havoc when you have
multiple Java versions installed), except that it doesn’t warn you about
it. It tells you about it through a DEBUG message, instead, so you have to
actually increase the logging detail and wade through more messages to find
it:



[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [debug] ( prunsrv.c:1644) Commons Daemon procrun log
initialized

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1648) Commons Daemon procrun
(1.0.9.0 64-bit) started

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1561) Running 'gr01in01tc70'
Service...

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [debug] ( prunsrv.c:1345) Inside ServiceMain...

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1089) Starting service...

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [debug] ( javajni.c:195 ) Invalid RuntimeLib
'D:\Java\jdk6\jre\bin\server\jvm.dll'

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [debug] ( javajni.c:197 ) Using Jre JavaHome
'C:\Program Files\Java\jre7'

[2012-03-20 16:32:41] [debug] ( javajni.c:206 ) loading jvm 'C:\Program
Files\Java\jre7\bin\server\jvm.dll'



After correcting the JVM path:



[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [debug] ( prunsrv.c:1644) Commons Daemon procrun log
initialized

[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1648) Commons Daemon procrun
(1.0.9.0 64-bit) started

[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1561) Running 'gr01in01tc70'
Service...

[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [debug] ( prunsrv.c:1345) Inside ServiceMain...

[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [info]  ( prunsrv.c:1089) Starting service...

[2012-03-20 16:46:13] [debug] ( javajni.c:206 ) loading jvm 'C:\Program
Files\Java\jre6\bin\server\jvm.dll'



IMO, this message should be a warning or even an error (preferable) so that
server admins know right off the bat that they’ve done something wrong.



Thoughts?

Reply via email to