Sorry Mark, I did not ignored moving the issue to the user list, I tried to reply on user list email, but because I am not subscribed to there my email failed (naturally), I do not want to subscribe to the list, as the volume of email is pretty high. I did not ask just question, I also send a code to solve a problem, maybe only me treated this as a problem. I just wanted to contribute back, right now my tomcat instances are running with modification code.
Anyway if you think this as a garbage, just throw away. Sorry for taking your time, and sorry from the whole group for disturbing best regards. Gunay Arslan On Apr 26, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 26/04/2012 19:54, gunay arslan wrote: >> Here I am not telling that we need to change the standards, I am >> suggesting to add a variable so for this session behavior, with >> default value running as it is right now, you need to check other >> lazy session creation change to value, restart the application. We >> will not dictate any thing, will not change anything. > > Actually the problem here is folks that ask user questions on the dev > list and then ignore the instruction to move the issue to the users list > where they would find that they have already been given the answer as to > how avoiding large numbers of sessions is already supported within the > current specifications and several previous versions. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
