On 11/06/2012 10:33, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/6/11  <ma...@apache.org>:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Mon Jun 11 09:24:53 2012
>> New Revision: 1348762
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348762&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
>> Stepping through the code, light dawns as to what the bug report was getting 
>> at.
>> Use the message from the Throwable for the error report if none was 
>> specified via sendError()
>>
>> Modified:
>>    tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/ErrorReportValve.java
>>    tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/valves/TestErrorReportValve.java
>>
>> Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/ErrorReportValve.java
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/ErrorReportValve.java?rev=1348762&r1=1348761&r2=1348762&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/ErrorReportValve.java 
>> (original)
>> +++ tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/ErrorReportValve.java Mon 
>> Jun 11 09:24:53 2012
>> @@ -141,7 +141,11 @@ public class ErrorReportValve extends Va
>>
>>         String message = RequestUtil.filter(response.getMessage());
>>         if (message == null) {
>> -            message = "";
>> +            if (throwable != null) {
>> +                message = RequestUtil.filter(throwable.getMessage());
>> +            } else {
>> +                message = "";
>> +            }
> 
> throwable.getMessage() can return null,  e.g. it usually happens with
> a NullPointerException

ACK. I'll fix that.

Mark

> 
> So it'd be better to do
>             if (throwable != null) {
>                 message = RequestUtil.filter(throwable.getMessage());
>             }
>             if (message == null) {
>                 message = "";
>             }
> 
> Alternatively, maybe String.valueOf(throwable.getMessage()) to convert
> null to "null". I cannot say what is better without a bit of
> experimenting,  but using "" as the value is what we had before.
> 
>>         }
>>
>>         // Do nothing if there is no report for the specified status code
>>
> 
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to