Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: >2012/9/24 <ma...@apache.org>: >> Author: markt >> Date: Sun Sep 23 21:09:22 2012 >> New Revision: 1389145 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1389145&view=rev >> Log: >> Some more low(ish) hanging fruit from the allocation hit list. This >accounts for ~8% due to the way Thread stores names.
>-1 for ReadWriteLock. >The problem with WeakHashMap is that its get() operation can modify it >(as it processes referencequeue). Thus you cannot use ReadWriteLock, >but must use plain synchronization here. Yep. I'll remove that class. ThreadLocal is a better solution for this problem anyway. Not sure why I didn't think of that the first time. I'll fix this later today. Cheers, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
