https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55536
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID OS| |All --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/xkxhfdrp6tslwkao I've yet to see anyone argue that adding rate limiting to SSL renegotiations for BIO and NIO is a worthwhile exercise. I'm not against it if there is a use case and I have a few ideas on how it might be done. But, at the moment, I simply don't see the point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org