On Sep 15, 2013, at 4:49 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2013 17:09, Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I think addressed those issues in the following changes: >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512150 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512151 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512153 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512158 > > BTW, there was no need to drop @version entirely; it was only the > $Date$ part that causes problems.
They had been removed from the rest of the codebase previously; I did that to match. > >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512166 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1512172 > > Those changes look OK at first glance. > >> except for the "several files without AL headers." I'll look to see which >> those are but pointers would help. > > I just ran RAT. > Sorry, but I did not keep the report. I see RAT has a Maven plugin - would it make sense to add that to the release profile for the project? Thanks Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
