On 17/10/2013 11:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/10/2013 10:55, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>> 2013/10/17 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>>
>>> On 17/10/2013 10:52, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/10/17 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16/10/2013 23:47, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, unfortunately it seems the Websocket implementation using the
>>>>>> deprecated proprietary API does not work correctly when using the
>>>>>> HTTP APR and NIO connector on Windows...
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip/>
>>>>>
>>>>>> With the BIO connector, everything works fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new JSR 356 examples work fine with BIO, NIO and APR connectors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have done some digging and I found that with r1516410, the old
>>>>>> Websocket implementation works fine with NIO and APR, but with
>>>>>> r1516411, it does not work anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the safest thing to do is to revert that change. I think I see
>>>>> see a better solution but I don't want to risk yet more regressions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see this as a cancellation of this vote but I would like to hear your
>>>> opinion also.
>>>
>>> As much as it pains me to say it, I think we need a new tag :(
>>>
>>
>> Ok
>> I can see you already committed the revert.
>> Can I start right now?
> 
> Hmm. The drawing board WebSocket example is currently broken for me.
> Need to figure out why.

My bad. I was running on Java 6 not 7.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to