Author: schultz
Date: Tue Oct 29 04:21:11 2013
New Revision: 1536585
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1536585
Log:
Votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=1536585&r1=1536584&r2=1536585&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Tue Oct 29 04:21:11 2013
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
* Better adherence to RFC2616 for content-length headers.
http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2013-09-11-tc6-content-length.patch
+1: markt
+ +0: schultz: I don't see anywhere in RFC2616 that suggests that multiple
Content-Length headers yields an invalid request. Another option for response
code in this case might be 411 Length Required. There are some conditions under
which Content-Type "RFC MUST" be ignored, and I don't see those cases in any of
the *Processor classes.
-1:
* Add support for limiting the size of chunk extensions when using chunked
@@ -110,13 +111,14 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
Notice files are corrected according to
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://svn.apache.org/r1533312
- +1: violetagg, kkolinko
+ +1: violetagg, kkolinko, schultz
-1:
+
* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55691
ArrayELResolver needs to handle the case where the base object is an array of
primitives.
http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2013-10-28-bug55691-tc6.patch
- +1: markt
+ +1: markt, schultz
-1:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
