Author: markt
Date: Thu Nov  7 10:11:11 2013
New Revision: 1539584

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1539584
Log:
Clarify

Modified:
    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=1539584&r1=1539583&r2=1539584&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Thu Nov  7 10:11:11 2013
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
   http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2013-09-11-tc6-content-length.patch
   +1: markt
   +0: schultz: I don't see anywhere in RFC2616 that suggests that multiple 
Content-Length headers yields an invalid request. Another option for response 
code in this case might be 411 Length Required. There are some conditions under 
which Content-Type "RFC MUST" be ignored, and I don't see those cases in any of 
the *Processor classes.
-      markt:   RFC2616 states that multiple headers of the same value may be
+      markt:   RFC2616 states that multiple headers of the same name may be
                merged in to a single, multi-valued header without any change in
                meaning. Content-Length is clearly defined as a single value
                header. If multiple values are not permitted then neither are



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to