https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56555
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #8) > I am -1 to r1598007 > > See how "Connection" header is defined in RFC2616 section 14.10 and > processing of "close" token in section 8.1.2.1. > > The Connection header is a multi-value header that declares names of header > fields that are for this connection only and are not forwarded by proxies. > > If you drop the Connection header you must drop any other headers that are > referenced in it. There are no grounds to do that. I understand (and agree with) your objections to r1598007. What isn't clear is what you think Tomcat should do here. Is your position that this issue should simply have been resolved as invalid as multiple connection headers are allowed and the presence of a connection: close will always close the connection? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
