Author: schultz
Date: Tue Oct 21 15:12:27 2014
New Revision: 1633393

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1633393
Log:
Revise vote

Modified:
    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=1633393&r1=1633392&r2=1633393&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Tue Oct 21 15:12:27 2014
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
 
 * Mitigate POODLE by disabling SSLv3 by default for JSSE
   http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2014-10-21-poodle-tc6-v2.patch
-  +1: markt
+  +1: markt, schultz
   -1:
   -0: kkolinko: I think that JSSESocketFactory.getEnabledProtocols() shall
        not return DEFAULT_SERVER_PROTOCOLS list in case if there are no
@@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
        I wish there were some debug logging to see what protocols are being
        filtered out by "if (protocol.contains("SSL"))".
        markt: Addressed in v2 patch
-  -0: schultz; I agree with Konstantin's critique. Small adjustments to the
-        proposal are in order. Additionally, the code for filtering protocols
-        should probably be factored-out into a separte method to ensure
-        the filtering stays consistent between the two methods that currently
-        do it.
-       markt: Addressed in v2 patch
+
+      schultz: it's not clear from the code what will happen if
+               DEFAULT_SERVER_PROTOCOLS remains null. Would it be more clear
+               to use an empty string array instead of null? I seem to recall
+               slightly different "null" behavior in Oracle/OpenJDK versus
+               IBM JVMs.
 
 * Mitigate POODLE by disabling SSLv3 by default for APR/native
   http://svn.apache.org/r1632586



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to