On 08/12/2014 20:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2014-12-08 21:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > >> On 04/12/2014 14:04, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>> 2014-12-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >>> >>>> Shouldn't there still be a single empty message in that case? Otherwise, >>>> how is the client meant to differentiate between no write and a write of >>>> zero length? >>>> >>> The problem I am trying to fix is extra empty messages when the writer is >>> not actually used (due to an error), so I might as well not do anything. >> >> I understand what you are trying to do but I'm still trying to >> understand the circumstances that lead this situation. Can you provide >> some more detail on what triggers the error? >> > A test expects some data in a message following an exception, and instead > gets an empty message first due to some writer mechanics (sent because the > writer is closed). The spec doesn't say anything about these empty > messages, so there is no reason to send them, it is not actually an > optimization.
What triggers the exception. That is the bit I don't understand. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
