https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45014
--- Comment #21 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #20) > Yes, I did note that "I guess in hindsight I could have implemented a > filter". This is a feature for hackers, my vote is to let people deal with > it to avoid having any additional support burden. I'm happy to simply leave the classes as attachments to this enhancement request and not commit anything. I don't personally have a use for them at this moment. A few years ago it occurred to me that they would be something useful for Valve authors. Since Valve is an internal API, Valve authors should already be comfortable with an unstable API. We'll see if this gets any votes. It's remained untouched for 6 years until this week. It's clear there is not much demand that the examples here will not fill. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
