think it is fixed on trunk, no? *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/4/3 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> > Hey guys, > > I noticed a new warning about it... > > WARNING: Could not create a secure Stax XMLInputFactory. Found class > com.ctc.wstx.stax.WstxInputFactory. Suggest Woodstox 4.2.0 or newer. > > []s, > Thiago. > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > i updated it this morning > > > > the question was first "can we add woodstox in jaxrs and plus" -> we > don't > > really have the choice IMHO > > > > then the question is "do we add it to webprofile too", it is not > mandatory > > but wonder about the consistency between distribs > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > > > 2013/4/3 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > > > > > What's the question exactly? > > > Woodstox is for parsing XML. > > > > > > As per some CXF users list exchanges, it looks like Woodstox is the > more > > > secure. Is that your concern? > > > Can we get rid of the one we are currently using? > > > > > > What the impacts/benefits? > > > > > > > > > 2013/4/2 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Any objection if i import woodstox tomorrow in tomee distribs - trunk > > > only > > > > ? > > > > > > > > What about web profile? That's the only one where it is not 100% > > > mandatory > > > > but wonder about consistency... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > >
