Basically you look part which are not in the server but tolling. Maybe not
your goal.

Maybe try to get familiar with the validation rules or try to enhance our
sample is easier and more valued for you
Le 6 juin 2013 01:15, "Oz M" <ozmol...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thank you Romain for the answer,
>
>
> By the way,
> I am writing tests for that class since I am very new to the project and
> wanted to start simple.
> The simplest thing I could think about is writing tests for the util
> package.
> If there are other tasks that you can recommend me to work on, that are
> more important to the project and you think they can be a good starting
> point I will very like to hear.
>
> Thanks,
> Oz Molaim
>
>
>
> 2013/6/6 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the map is a trick to store values (because you don't know which
> connectors
> > you'll find) but it is not intended to stack all values. If nothing is in
> > the map default value is expected and as it is passed in parameter no
> need
> > to store it.
> >
> > This class is used for particular needs (not sure why you ends up on
> these
> > part of the product btw) and adding the default value in the map wouldn't
> > bring any gain and IMO it wouldn't make sense since it will not be used
> > then.
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/5 Oz M <ozmol...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I am in the middle of writing unit tests for *QuickServerXmlParser*.
> > >
> > > Looking at the code of QuickServerXmlParser#value(KEY, DEFAUTL_VALUE)
> it
> > > seems that in case the underlying map does not contain the key KEY the
> > > method return DEFAULT_VALUE but DEFAULT_VALUE isn't being saved in the
> > > underlying map as you would expect.
> > >
> > > Is it on purpose?
> > > If it is what the reason we are doing it?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Oz Molaim
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> בברכה,
> עוז מולאים
>

Reply via email to