Which interest of the installer in tomee (= already installed)? The only
interest if for tomee-*-webapp which wouldn't change at all. I just propose
to remove it from our zip/tar.gz if it was not clear

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/9/25 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>

> >>great, the question then is: do we remove tomee webapp from tomee
> >>distributions? (+1 from me)
> tomee-webapp should be part of the distribution imo. It contains the
> "ServerServlet" and the "InstallerServlet". It will contain a minimun
> interface for the installer.
> tomee-webaccess (or tomee-admin) woulnd't be part of the main distribution.
> It would be users choice to manually install it by dropping the
> "tomee-webaccess.war".
>
> >>yep. Said in another way if we build a complex project for the admin gui
> >>maybe we'd need to create another subproject (another trunk), wdyt?
> I went ahead and merged the projects into a single one. Much better this
> way. Thanks!
> I don't think it should be outside the main tomee build. It woulnd't be
> part of the main distribution but it would still follow the tomee build.
> Currently, it is independent enough to be built separately, but a "mvn
> clean install" on root builds it too. It's one of the modules of
> "trunk/tomee".
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > responses inline
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/25 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Hi Romain,
> > >
> > > >>Webaccess modules shouldnt be renamed tomee-webaccess (or admin-gui
> as
> > we
> > > >>spoke in another thread)?
> > > Yep, I plan to get back to that project this evening. I'm finishing the
> > > changes on tomee-webapp (removing all the gui stuff from it), then I
> will
> > > move back to it.
> > >
> > >
> > great, the question then is: do we remove tomee webapp from tomee
> > distributions? (+1 from me)
> >
> >
> > >  >>The other and more impacting point is: why N module for the gui? Why
> > not
> > > >>putting it all together in a war module?
> > > I didn't get this one. :) Did you mean getting rid of the gui
> > sub-modules?
> > >
> > >
> > yep. Said in another way if we build a complex project for the admin gui
> > maybe we'd need to create another subproject (another trunk), wdyt?
> >
> >
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This mail is mainly for Thiago but that's some open thoughts.
> > > >
> > > > Webaccess modules shouldnt be renamed tomee-webaccess (or admin-gui
> as
> > we
> > > > spoke in another thread)?
> > > >
> > > > The other and more impacting point is: why N module for the gui? Why
> > not
> > > > putting it all together in a war module?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to