+1 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/12 Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org>: > +1... It works like a charm! > > []s, > Thiago. > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 ;-) >> >> Jeff >> >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. >> > >> > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 >> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're >> good to go. >> > >> > Maven Repo: >> > >> > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ >> > >> > Binaries: >> > >> > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ >> > >> > Tag: >> > >> > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ >> > >> > >> > The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a >> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect >> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. >> > >> > If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new >> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set >> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. >> Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing >> to make up for their lost time. :) >> > >> > >> > -David >> > >> >>
