Hi Bjorn, Thanks for the feedback Would you give it a try with the other set of binaries and let us know? The vote is currently opened so feel free to vote as well.
Thanks, JLouis 2013/11/13 Bjorn Danielsson <bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com> > For whatever it's worth, my application works fine with the > "staging-108" version. I am using Eclipselink so I wouldn't > notice any OpenJPA build issues. Been running 1.5.2-plus for > the past seven months and redeployed in 1.6.0-jaxrs without > any issues since 5 days now. > > -- > Bjorn Danielsson > Cuspy Code AB > > > David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Had 12 TCK failures in this build I think due to my OpenJPA build. Mark > is now publishing OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries to Nexus for an vote. I'll try > rerolling with that version. > > > > If that works and TCK is clear, I'll put the vote. > > > > -David > > > > On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:38 AM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> The release tools need work, but this build is good and running the TCK > now. > >> > >> Maven Repository: > >> > >> - > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-108/ > >> > >> Staged Binaries: > >> > >> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-108/tomee-1.6.0/ > >> > >> Source Branch: > >> > >> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.6.0/ > >> > >> > >> The Legal tool I wrote appears to not be working, so we'll have to do > this on manually on that. I did check and there appeared to be no > significant binary changes between 1.5.2 and 1.6.0. > >> > >> Give these binaries a swift kicking, so when we vote we know things are > good. The goal is to close the vote on the 72 hours mark once it starts. > That will hopefully be very soon. > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > -- Jean-Louis