Hi Bjorn,

Thanks for the feedback
Would you give it a try with the other set of binaries and let us know?
The vote is currently opened so feel free to vote as well.

Thanks,
JLouis


2013/11/13 Bjorn Danielsson <bjorn-apa...@lists.cuspycode.com>

> For whatever it's worth, my application works fine with the
> "staging-108" version. I am using Eclipselink so I wouldn't
> notice any OpenJPA build issues. Been running 1.5.2-plus for
> the past seven months and redeployed in 1.6.0-jaxrs without
> any issues since 5 days now.
>
> --
> Bjorn Danielsson
> Cuspy Code AB
>
>
> David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Had 12 TCK failures in this build I think due to my OpenJPA build.  Mark
> is now publishing OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries to Nexus for an vote.  I'll try
> rerolling with that version.
> >
> > If that works and TCK is clear, I'll put the vote.
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:38 AM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The release tools need work, but this build is good and running the TCK
> now.
> >>
> >> Maven Repository:
> >>
> >> -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-108/
> >>
> >> Staged Binaries:
> >>
> >> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-108/tomee-1.6.0/
> >>
> >> Source Branch:
> >>
> >> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.6.0/
> >>
> >>
> >> The Legal tool I wrote appears to not be working, so we'll have to do
> this on manually on that.  I did check and there appeared to be no
> significant binary changes between 1.5.2 and 1.6.0.
> >>
> >> Give these binaries a swift kicking, so when we vote we know things are
> good.  The goal is to close the vote on the 72 hours mark once it starts.
>  That will hopefully be very soon.
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
>



-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to