Not sure David, this would at least allow us to use mvn release plugin and avoid current state where trunk is the snapqhot of the already released version. It would also allow an easier code mintainance regarding version (we use it in several places, pom and java). Le 24 nov. 2013 23:23, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> More a note to Romain as I've not seen anyone else propose changing the > version number to match OpenEJB. To be honest, I'm not sure what this > would give us. > > It wouldn't make releases any easier or harder. > > > -David > > On Nov 24, 2013, at 1:16 PM, Bjorn Danielsson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Ideally TomEE would have a version number that tracks both > > the Java EE version and the Tomcat version, while it is also > > matching the OpenEJB version. But satisfying all of this is > > obviously impossible, so why not just bump the TomEE version > > to match the OpenEJB version at the next opportunity? > > > > -- > > Bjorn Danielsson > > Cuspy Code AB > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> we are still in x.6.0-SNAPSHOT on trunk > >> > >> what do we decide for "+1" version? x.6.1-SNAPSHOT or 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT > >> or 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT or sthg else? > >> > >> first is the "logical" one but means we still target JavaEE6, > >> 2.0.0 is good for tomee but as said in another thread I'd like to > >> align openejb and tomee > >> 5.0.0 comes from this last point > >> > >> I propose to keep this thread up a bit if there is discussion and then > >> maybe throw a vote. > >> > >> wdyt? > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >
