I don't care really about the naming as soon as it gets as stable as possible and consistent. Just for you information, the usual naming convention adds "shadded" at the end of the artifact. For example, we already have xbean-finder-shadded and xbean-asm-shadded.
JLouis 2013/12/11 AndyG <andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com> > So how would we feel with 'openejb-shade-[quartz]' ? And eventually bring > all > shade jars in line with that naming? > > I'm happy to do the maven stuff either way. > > Andy > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p4666686.html > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Jean-Louis
