I've sent a pull request containing the test case and a spelling fix which the ASF GitHub bot successfully picked up and attached to the issue in JIRA.
Best regards, Tommy Tynjä On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Tommy Tynjä <[email protected]> wrote: > Seems like this case is already covered by the AnnotationDeployer. I've > created a test case which demonstrates this. So it should be enough to just > add the test case to the test suite in order to resolve the issue. See: > https://github.com/tommysdk/tomee/commit/ce7ca1abe664f074973f2bf480b9411071af664e > > Best regards, > Tommy Tynjä > > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Deployer check blocking things nirmally otherwise we should move these >> checks in checkxxxx so id go for checkannotations >> Le 15 mars 2014 05:58, "Tommy Tynjä" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> > I started looking at OPENEJB-1836 (Validation: @Local on bean with >> > no-interface should use @LocalBean) and have been browsing the code base >> > somewhat. >> > >> > The check would be rather easy to put into CheckAnnotations, alongside >> the >> > already present @WebService validation. There are however some @Local >> > checks in AnnotationDeployer as well, around row 3064. What would be the >> > most preferrable place to insert this validation? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Tommy Tynjä >> > >> > >
