oops sorry (and thanks for the catch). Second link was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-03-20 14:20 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org>: > Hi Romain, > > Did you send the same link twice? :) > > []s > Thiago > Are you looking to include in 1.7.2? > > Jon > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'd like TomEE to get at least > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573. To get consistent > with > > last delivery we should get > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573 as well. > > > > Ho do you want to tackle it? > > > > 1- we import the changes in our fork > > 2- (surely for Mark) openjpa release (still need to be j6) > > > > wdyt? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > >
