Here is the original thread http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/openjpa-patches-td4674131.html
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-04-20 9:49 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>: > Yes - We have been waiting for an OpenJPA release. Other than that, we are > ready to go. I would still like to be release manager for this one unless > there are any objections to that. In terms of going ahead without the > OpenJPA update, I think Romain had a couple of patches for a couple of JIRA > tickets. Not sure what they are - Romain, perhaps you could add a couple of > links here when you have a second? > > Thanks > > Jon > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Le 20 avr. 2015 08:30, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > > If that, or anything else, fails then I think we should go ahead. There > > > won't be a problem doing 1.7.3 if we need to. > > > We have been plugging the 1.7.2 for quite a while already. > > > > > > > Well there is a big regression in it so we shouldnt release again with > > this. But we could patch it on our side. > > > > > On 20 April 2015 at 08:19, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le 20 avr. 2015 08:12, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[email protected]> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to do the 1.7.2, just not sure why it's stalled? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Need to wait end of openjpa release and upgrade. > > > > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device. > > > > > On 20 Apr 2015 07:04, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" < > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, does not change the original issue, but still it's wrong. > > > > > > There is no theory versus reality just people willing or not to > do > > > > > > releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > well the difference with what you say and what I say is theory > vs > > > > reality > > > > > > > (you know it more than anyone else). Just trying to be > realistic > > + > > > > doesnt > > > > > > > change the original issue/proposal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > Tomitriber > > > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-04-18 19:50 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plus we can release them only on maven which means we dont > > need > > > > a > > > > > > > > > pmc for it :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romain, even with a smiley at the end, it's still *wrong* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Gallimore > http://twitter.com/jongallimore > http://www.tomitribe.com >
