It was fast

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:

> updated
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-05-14 12:56 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
> > Guys, i'd like to finish the gav changes by updating the groupid to
> > org.apache.tomee everywhere for tomee 7.
> >
> > If you have any objection please shout otherwise I'll do it on monday.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-05-07 9:21 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> >
> >>
> >> 2015-05-07 1:49 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]
> >:
> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > 1) do we keep org.apache.openejb as groupid or do we finally go to
> >>> > org.apache.tomee?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.tomee
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > 2) do we create a dependency module (as assembly) with N children
> >>> providing
> >>> > pre-built pom for jaxrs embedded, tomee embedded jaxrs, plume
> >>> > etc....Advantage would be to get rid of our internal dependencies as
> >>> main
> >>> > dependencies for users (I think to openejb-core for instance) + it
> >>> would
> >>> > make it easier to start for users when needing some advanced setup
> >>> (tomee
> >>> > embedded "plus" for instance).
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Overall idea is fine, but I had a pretty bad experience with bom and
> all
> >>> this crap previously. Usually it's worst than dealing with the real
> deps.
> >>> So +0 for me
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Well bom is the usage you do of it - I'm not a fan too. Here the idea is
> >> to propose some stability. Let say I do all the changes I spoke about
> then
> >> all your projects are broken and you need to redo your dependencies. If
> >> that's ok (actually it is just adding/removing 3-4 deps) we don't need
> it
> >> and that's fine.
> >>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi guys,
> >>> >
> >>> > while voting on the version i'd like to propose to discuss 2 more
> >>> topics:
> >>> >
> >>> > 1) do we keep org.apache.openejb as groupid or do we finally go to
> >>> > org.apache.tomee?
> >>> > 2) do we create a dependency module (as assembly) with N children
> >>> providing
> >>> > pre-built pom for jaxrs embedded, tomee embedded jaxrs, plume
> >>> > etc....Advantage would be to get rid of our internal dependencies as
> >>> main
> >>> > dependencies for users (I think to openejb-core for instance) + it
> >>> would
> >>> > make it easier to start for users when needing some advanced setup
> >>> (tomee
> >>> > embedded "plus" for instance).
> >>> >
> >>> > wdyt?
> >>> >
> >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >>> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to