It's a milestone Romain. It won't be perfect we know, but gives us a chance to have feedback and take time to release OWB and other issues for milestone 2.
So i'd say go for it anyway Andy. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Should be dropped since it is in javaee (it is actually not used) > > Ps: we need next owb for perf+ mem reasons > Le 15 juin 2015 09:53, "agumbrecht" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi guys, > > > > I don't see any changes since the geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec > 1.0-alpha-1 > > release, so I'm going to use this on the TomEE milestone1 unless anyone > has > > a reason for keeping the 1.0-SNAPSHOT? - I will leave that in master for > > now. > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > ----- > > -- > > Andy Gumbrecht > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > [email protected] > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe > > > > TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Using-geronimo-concurrent-1-0-spec-1-0-alpha-1-tp4675287.html > > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
