what's the cost of havingboth BTW?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-06-23 17:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > I really like Alpine. Gives you apk as well but is really down to the core > without any useless ballast. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 23.06.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > debian is more known IMO but not sure it changes much things for final > > users, what's your opinion Alex? > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > > 2015-06-23 17:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Guys what do you prefer for official Docker image. Be light with Alpine > or > >> be versatile with Debian? > >> > >> El dl., 22 juny 2015 a les 23:59, Alex Soto (<asot...@gmail.com>) va > >> escriure: > >> > >>> Thanks well I am still not 100% happy, what I am wondering is if debian > >>> image or alpine image. I m hesitant about this :) > >>> > >>> El dl., 22 juny 2015 a les 23:23, Jean-Louis Monteiro (< > >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>) va escriure: > >>> > >>>> This is awesome Alex. > >>>> Thanks for driving this from start to end. > >>>> > >>>> Really great contribution. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi mates I have been working on creating a TomEE image in Docker. > >>>>> I am closely to be able to release an Apache TomEE official > repository > >>>> on > >>>>> docker hub, but I prefer you take a look first. > >>>>> > >>>>> First of all I have decided to change from official openjdk image > >> which > >>>> is > >>>>> based on debian, to official Alpine image. This change is pretty > >> simple, > >>>>> the Alpine docker image is a light docker image (only 5MB) and > >> following > >>>>> the philosophy of TomEE of light yet powerful distribution, I think > >>>> this is > >>>>> a really good movement in these terms. Now the TomEE Docker image is > >>>> 200MB > >>>>> less than the one using Debian. Concretely 191MB in front of 379MB. > >>>>> > >>>>> Let me share with you the Dockerfile content: > >>>>> > >>>>> FROM alpine:3.2 > >>>>> > >>>>> RUN apk --update add bash > >>>>> RUN apk --update add curl > >>>>> RUN apk --update add openjdk7 > >>>>> RUN apk --update add gnupg > >>>>> > >>>>> # add our user and group first to make sure their IDs get assigned > >>>>> consistently, regardless of whatever dependencies get added > >>>>> RUN addgroup -S tomee && adduser -S -G tomee tomee > >>>>> > >>>>> ENV PATH /usr/local/tomee/bin:$PATH > >>>>> RUN mkdir -p /usr/local/tomee > >>>>> RUN chown tomee:tomee /usr/local/tomee > >>>>> WORKDIR /usr/local/tomee > >>>>> USER tomee > >>>>> > >>>>> RUN curl -SL http://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS -o KEYS \ > >>>>> && gpg --import KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> RUN curl -SL > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/tomee-1.7.2/apache-tomee-1.7.2-webprofile.tar.gz.asc > >>>>> -o > >>>>> tomee.tar.gz.asc > >>>>> > >>>>> RUN curl -SL > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://apache.rediris.es/tomee/tomee-1.7.2/apache-tomee-1.7.2-webprofile.tar.gz > >>>>> -o > >>>>> tomee.tar.gz \ > >>>>> && tar -zxvf tomee.tar.gz \ > >>>>> && gpg --verify tomee.tar.gz.asc tomee.tar.gz \ > >>>>> && mv apache-tomee-webprofile-1.7.2/* /usr/local/tomee \ > >>>>> && rm -Rf apache-tomee-plus-1.7.2 \ > >>>>> && rm bin/*.bat \ > >>>>> && rm tomee.tar.gz* > >>>>> > >>>>> EXPOSE 8080 > >>>>> CMD ["catalina.sh", "run"] > >>>>> > >>>>> But it has two drawback is that alpine 3.2 still don't have support > in > >>>> APK > >>>>> for openjdk8, but it will be added for alpine 3.3 so I am quite > >>>> confident > >>>>> that the best way to proceed is wait until it is released and then > >>>> update > >>>>> our Dockerfile and finally release our image as official image with > >>>>> OpenJDK8. > >>>>> > >>>>> The second problem is that we are setting alpine linux as default > >> image > >>>> in > >>>>> our distribution and not a more popular like Debian. > >>>>> > >>>>> Another message I have seen while creating the image was this one: > >>>>> > >>>>> gpg: Signature made Sun May 17 22:18:30 2015 UTC using DSA key ID > >>>> D297D428 > >>>>> gpg: Good signature from "Jonathan Gallimore <jgallim...@apache.org > >" > >>>>> [unknown] > >>>>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > >>>>> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to > the > >>>>> owner. > >>>>> Primary key fingerprint: DBCC D103 B8B2 4F86 FFAA B025 C8BB 472C > D297 > >>>> D428 > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know if Jonathan's key was not created by a trusted key. > >>>>> > >>>>> Well that's all, let me know what you think about this change or what > >>>> you > >>>>> would like to see in official TomEE image. > >>>>> > >>>>> Alex. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
