Get a regression in embedded mode for:

NormalContextTest>Arquillian.run:164->testGetMayNotReturnNullUnlessContextualCreateReturnsNull:90
null


didnt investigate yet why but tomee is ok


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-08-08 0:20 GMT-07:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> it is running (locally)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-08-08 0:18 GMT-07:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
>
>> FYI: Vote for OWB-1.6.2 is otw.
>>
>>
>> Romain, can you plz update the tomee builds and switch the CI builds to
>> it. So we see TomEE still passes all the TCK tests with the new OWB version.
>>
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Friday, 7 August 2015, 23:22, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > +1
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>  Hi!
>> >>
>> >>  I'd like to call a VOTE for a maintenance release of Apache
>> >>  OpenWebBeans-1.6.2.
>> >>
>> >>  We fixed 2 bugs which are needed by TomEE-7.x
>> >>
>> >>  Here is the staging repo:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1015/
>> >>
>> >>  And here is the source release:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1015/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.2/openwebbeans-1.6.2-source-release.zip
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  [+1] let's ship it
>> >>  [+0] meh don't care
>> >>  [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>> >>
>> >>  The VOTE is open for 72h.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  txs and LieGrue,
>> >>  strub
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regard,
>> > Daniel Cunha (soro)
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to