Hi Alex Local protocol allows nicer start so very tempted to keep it like that. Servlet protocol has few bugs/issues and is not what you target by default with embedded adapters IMO. Le 4 oct. 2015 01:25, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit :
> Hey Alex, > > To be honest, I find the protocol section of arquillian the most confusing > for new users to pick up. Why should they care what the protocol > transferring the test data is using? I remember at the beginning, AS7 had > a JMX protocol. This made tons of sense, since it didn't impact the > running application. No one understood why their tests stopped work > though! Truth be told, the fact that most people end up relying on > servlet, without even realizing that its the arquillian runtime starting an > HTTP request makes it confusing to understand scope. Basically, users end > up relying on the servlet protocol to start their HTTP request for them, > instead of starting an HTTP request for their test invocation. > > Just curious, is this out on discourse somewhere? I can continue my whine > fest there :-) > > John > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 4:58 PM Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello mates, > > > > I send this email to start a discussion for a change on TomEE Arquillian > > Adapter. > > > > The other day, because of the book (Arquillian In Action), I checked the > > protocol used by different adapters. I noticed that only Weld adapter and > > TomEE embedded adapter are using the local protocol,all other ones are > > using the Servlet 3.0 protocol. And maybe you are asking why this is > > important? Well the problem is that a lot of extensions requires this > > protocol to work, for example Arquillian Persistence extension or > Arquillan > > Warp extension. In case a user wants to use embedded TomEE and one > > extension that requires servlet protocol, it would get a cryptic > exception. > > Of course there is a workaround and it is overriding the default protocol > > by using protocol special tag in arquillian.xml and adding the > > servlet-protocol dependency. > > > > I think that it would be easier for everyone if all adapters works in the > > same way. With the release of TomEE 7 I think it could be a good > > opportunity to make this change in the Arquillian embedded adapter as > well > > and align with the rest of the containers. > > > > The change to be done is very simple in terms of code (Adding one > > dependency and change one String of the adapter). > > > > What do you think? From the point of view of Arquillian community it > would > > be the logic step. > > > > Alex. > > >
