unsafe is fine (and you don't really have the choice actually)

Wonder if we should add a flag support in the resource adapter
definition/properties to force the use of java proxies (= prevent
subclassing)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-06-29 1:03 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>:

> Thanks for that. It'll probably come as no surprise to you that the
> resource adapter I am looking at does not have a no-arg constructor for its
> ManagedConnection object (JmsSession). I have attempted to make this work,
> but would appreciate another pair of eyes. I'm specifically curious as to
> whether there is a "better" way. I'm not mad keen on using Unsafe, but will
> note that all our no-interface proxy code uses it, so if we wanted to
> eliminate it, we'd need to work in that area too. I also had a go at
> extending the test to cover this, and would appreciate any thoughts there
> too.
>
> Here's my attempt:
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/80/commits/
> 4e69b3fe8d640445cf90a9a94d8c132e52535939
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1, think hazelcast was doing it too at some point (never got why it was
> > often done with a spec making interfaces the first citizen ;))
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2017-06-29 0:00 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any objections to this change being backported to
> > > tomee-1.7.x:
> > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/64ca1f3e9f7965d35e7a70a06ae604
> > > 41d026c9a1
> > > ?
> > >
> > > I'm specifically looking to use this resource adapter:
> > > https://github.com/jms-ra/generic-jms-ra/tree/1.x with 1.7.x which
> > > requires
> > > this change as it tries to cast a ManagedConnection object back to the
> > > actual class.
> > >
> > > My specific backport with merge issues and J7 -> J6 issues resolved is
> > here
> > > for review: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/80
> > >
> > > The original patch and issue details are here:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1908
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to