*typo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-site-generator.git is the right one
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-07-04 18:33 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > imported the generator in https://git-wip-us.apache. > org/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, will push a warning in > the svn project for now and we can delete it later > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-07-04 18:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> Ok submitted https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-gen >> erator.git, >> >> @John: do you have more details about gitwcsub, didnt find much except >> it is the git replacement of svnpubsub? idea would be to sync a generated >> folder with the remote "content" repo. Very worse case I can add it to our >> generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;) >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> >> 2017-07-04 17:20 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >> >>> Would be better to request a git repo via https://reporeq.apache.org/ if >>> you want a repository. You may also want to consider using gitwcsub >>> instead of svnpubsub for the actual generated site. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:15 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it >>> - it >>> > doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in >>> > particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is >>> a >>> > concern at any level. >>> > >>> > >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >>> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>> > >>> > 2017-07-04 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < >>> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> >>> > : >>> > >>> > > As in +1 for moving the project :-) >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < >>> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > +1 >>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho < >>> > > ivanjunc...@gmail.com> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> I think last time I checked github for the website was not up to >>> date. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Cunha < >>> daniels...@apache.org> >>> > > >> wrote: >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > Well, TomEE already moved to git, you don't need to use SVN. >>> > > >> > PR integration already works fine, I saw that with last >>> Jean-Louis's >>> > > >> merge. >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > But yes, will be awesome to have it, we can use it like a stage >>> and >>> > > the >>> > > >> > process to deploy in prod will be identical. >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > +1 for that. >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho < >>> > > >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com> >>> > > >> > wrote: >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > This would be great, way better than doing svn patches. >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > +1 >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> > > >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>> > > >> > > wrote: >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > Hi guys, >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > I asked INFRA to proxy our new website project on github >>> but it >>> > > >> looks >>> > > >> > > hard, >>> > > >> > > > they propose us to move the project to another git repo. >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > Anyone against it? >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > For reference here is the ticket: >>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14249 >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > Concretely we would get a git-asf/site-tomee-ng.git (or >>> > > equivalent) >>> > > >> and >>> > > >> > > > have a github proxy. >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we >>> copy the >>> > > >> output >>> > > >> > > to >>> > > >> > > > content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven >>> > > plugin. >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > > >> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> > > >> > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >>> > > >> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>> > https://github.com/ >>> > > >> > > > rmannibucau> | >>> > > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE >>> > > Factory >>> > > >> > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > -- >>> > > >> > Daniel Cunha >>> > > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
