Or just compile it yourself from source: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/javaee-api/trunk
LieGrue, strub > Am 16.02.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > I think we did, but I probably did not deploy our javaee-api yet. > > Started the deploy jus tnow. > > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 16.02.2018 um 07:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >> Dont think our ee api has upgraded to >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxrs_2.1_spec/ >> yet since we didnt have cxf 3.2. >> >> Le 16 févr. 2018 00:49, "Jonathan Gallimore" <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> >> a écrit : >> >>> Ok, locally (with the merge), I get test errors due >>> to: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >>> javax/ws/rs/client/CompletionStageRxInvoker. Possibly a bad javaee >>> dependency or something. I'll do a compare tomorrow and try and get that >>> resolved, and get my changes pushed. >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> PS: xbean-asm6 is needed for java9 support. >>>> Already using it in OWB and Meecrowave without any problems. >>>> So all should work fine. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 15.02.2018 um 19:20 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> oki great, I've just upgraded to tomcat-9.0.5 and right now upgrading >>> to >>>> xbean-asm6-shaded. >>>>> Will ping you once done. >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Am 15.02.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore < >>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> We definitely need a tomee-7 branch. I have done a merge of master to >>>> the >>>>>> tomee8_fb branch, and I'm making sure it builds and tests pass etc, >>>> before >>>>>> pushing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jon >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Mark Struberg >>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> probably a good idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A tomee7 release should still be cut. But that could be done on a >>>> tomee7.x >>>>>>> branch as well >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will create a separate thread. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>> strub >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2018 um 18:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and probably switch the branch. master doesnt get much activity and >>> in >>>>>>> any >>>>>>>> case all the activity it gets can be done on the 8 branch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2018-02-15 18:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and now we should be passing both the tck/cdi-embedded and >>>>>>> tck/cdi-tomee! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So it's time to move forward to updating various dependencies, >>>> samples >>>>>>> etc >>>>>>>>> ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2018 um 11:42 schrieb Mark Struberg >>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Really appreciated, thanks Jon! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Due to the upgrade to Tomcat-9 we also might have to fix a few >>> other >>>>>>>>> tests along the line. >>>>>>>>>> I mainly focused on the CDI TCK for now as this is naturally the >>>> area >>>>>>>>> where I can be of most use. >>>>>>>>>> I'll also gonna release OWB tonight or so. Just wanted to first >>> fix >>>> the >>>>>>>>> TomEE tck to really catch all odds in OWB. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.02.2018 um 11:06 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore < >>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At the risk of adding to my ever-growing task list and >>> potentially >>>>>>>>> becoming >>>>>>>>>>> a bottleneck, I did some EAR / RAR related fixes in master. I'll >>>> port >>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>> forward and help look at these tests. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We now pass all tests in tck/cdi-embedded >>>>>>>>>>>> And we have only 3 failing tests in tck/cdi-tomee. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <class name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.packaging.ear. >>>>>>>>>>>> MultiWebModuleWithExtensionTest"/> >>>>>>>>>>>> <class name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.deployment.packaging.rar. >>>>>>>>>>>> ResourceAdapterArchiveTest"/> >>>>>>>>>>>> <class name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.lookup.modules. >>>>>>>>>>>> InterModuleELResolutionTest"/> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Those tests are all EAR related. >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe they are only Arquillian adapter issues? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.02.2018 um 13:30 schrieb Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, this is why there are passivation listeners and stuff in >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> Servlet spec. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We could easily also send a specific CDI event for it. But >>> there >>>> is >>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>>> such event in the CDI spec so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The @Destryoed and @BeforeDestroyed are specifically for >>>>>>> _destroyal_. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.02.2018 um 12:12 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm, it is more vicious cause if the session is not destroyed >>>> you >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to trigger this event. Guess it is another case where >>> both >>>>>>> cases >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> desirable (i want to clean up related state of the >>> session...as >>>>>>> well >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't want to touch the session)... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the appcontext destroy can be used as a workaround I >>>> think it >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to challenge them now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-08 11:37 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yea, it's mainly testing whether the @Observes >>>> @BeforeDestroyed( >>>>>>>>>>>> SessionScoped.class) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and @Destroyed(SessionScoped.class) do work. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tests itself are fine, but instead of relying that the >>>>>>> sessions >>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed at server shutdown they could also have used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Session.invalidate()... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.02.2018 um 11:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-08 11:28 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the embedded tests are now green. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm now working on cdi-tomes (webprofile TCK). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far we have 10 errors, but a few TCK tests are broken >>>> because >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrongly assume that a container stop also kills the >>> Session. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can make them passing. We already did this kind of hack >>> but >>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> container have pluggability here - for good reasons - I >>> agree >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't be in the TCK. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've challenged those tests. Still have to review every red >>>>>>>>> test... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.02.2018 um 11:19 schrieb Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nearly there! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2018 11:57, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1567, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, >>> Skipped: 5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wohuuu, 1 to go! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 02.02.2018 um 21:54 schrieb Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And the last status: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntime >>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 >>> expected >>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1570, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, >>> Skipped: >>>> 22 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reminder: this is for cdi-embedded only for now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But once we are through that the rest is usually much >>>> easier. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 23:18 schrieb Mark Struberg < >>>>>>>>> strub...@yahoo.de >>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>>>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContex >>>>>>>>>>>> tTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvoc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ationContextTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMetho >>>>>>>>> dInvocationContextTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » >>> EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntime >>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 >>> expected >>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1573, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, >>>> Skipped: 22 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 1 February 2018, 14:37:17 CET, Mark >>> Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With a bit help from Romains we are now down to 10 >>>> failing >>>>>>>>> tests: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>>>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContex >>>>>>>>>>>> tTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvoc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ationContextTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMetho >>>>>>>>> dInvocationContextTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » >>> EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntime >>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 >>> expected >>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testDecoratorMetadata:91 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testInterceptorMetadata:78 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1577, Failures: 10, Errors: 0, >>>> Skipped: >>>>>>> 26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 1 February 2018, 00:21:58 CET, Mark >>> Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed the new CDI-2.0 <trim/> feature. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now down to 16 ^^ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testInjection:79 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected object to not be null >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testResolution:86->AbstractTest.getUniqueBean: >>>>>>> 133->AbstractTest. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolveUniqueBean:169 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » UnsatisfiedResolution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EJBAsyncObserverMethodRemoteBu >>>>>>>>>>>> sinessMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EJBObserverMethodRemoteBusines >>>>>>>>> sMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContex >>>>>>>>>>>> tTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropa >>>>>>>>>>>> gationInAsyncObserverTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextNotPropagated:68 >>>>>>> expected >>>>>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropa >>>>>>>>>>>> gationInAsyncObserverTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextPropagation:59 >>>>>>> NullPointer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvoc >>>>>>>>>>>> ationContextTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMetho >>>>>>>>> dInvocationContextTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » >>> EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ContainerLifeCycleEventRuntime >>>>>>>>>>>> InvocationTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest> >>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 >>> expected >>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testDecoratorMetadata:91 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testInterceptorMetadata:78 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1585, Failures: 16, Errors: 0, >>>> Skipped: >>>>>>> 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 11:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From memory, until you need jsf or advanced web stuff >>>> all >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded mode. That said we can need to tune jaas to >>>> match >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expectations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the tcks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-01-31 11:00 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Txs JL! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, this is the current status: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failures: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseDefaultBeanDiscovery >>>>>>> ModeTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest> >>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testInjection:79 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected object to not be null >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ResourceAdapterArchiveTest> >>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testResolution:86->AbstractTest.getUniqueBean: >>>>>>>>>>>> 133->AbstractTest. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolveUniqueBean:169 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » UnsatisfiedResolution >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] TrimmedBeanArchiveTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deployment can't... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseTrimmedBeanArchiveTe >>> st>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Deployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EJBAsyncObserverMethodRemoteBu >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sinessMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EJBObserverMethodRemoteBusines >>>>>>>>> sMethodTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] ObserverMethodInvocationContex >>>>>>>>>>>> tTest>Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropa >>>>>>>>>>>> gationInAsyncObserverTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextNotPropagat >>>> ed:68 >>>>>>>>>>>> expected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [true] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] EnterpriseSecurityContextPropa >>>>>>>>>>>> gationInAsyncObserverTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testSecurityContextPropagation >>> :59 >>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanObserverMethodInvoc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ationContextTest>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run:164->testTransactionalObserverMethod:55 » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] SessionBeanStaticObserverMetho >>>>>>>>> dInvocationContextTest> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164->testTransactionalObserverMetho >>> d:55 >>>> » >>>>>>>>> EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataEEBeanTest> >>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptedBeanForEEComponentIsNullInInterceptor:61 >>>>>>>>> expected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [true] but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found [false] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testDecoratorMetadata:91 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] BuiltinMetadataSessionBeanTest >>>>>>>>>> Arquillian.run:164-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testInterceptorMetadata:78 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » EJB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessDisposalMethodTe >>> st>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] RemoteBusinessProducerMethodTe >>> st>Arquillian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillianBeforeClass:109 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> » Runtime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1587, Failures: 17, Errors: 0, >>>> Skipped: >>>>>>>>> 19 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll fix the trim test next. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I need a bit help with the others as I'm not >>> quite >>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests are supposed to work in cdi-embedded or only in >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full-profile. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have some failures like: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: javax.ejb.EJBAccessException: Unauthorized >>>>>>>>> Access by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Principal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denied >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.openejb.core. >>>> stateless.StatelessContainer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invoke(StatelessContainer.java:189) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm. >>> EjbObjectProxyHandler. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synchronizedBusinessMethod( >>> EjbObjectProxyHandler.java: >>>>>>> 265) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm. >>> EjbObjectProxyHandler. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> businessMethod(EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:260) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EjbObjectProxyHandler._invoke( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EjbObjectProxyHandler.java:89) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.openejb.core.ivm. >>>>>>> BaseEjbProxyHandler.invoke( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BaseEjbProxyHandler.java:347) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> observer.context.enterprise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> staticMethod.Printer$$LocalBeanProxy.printSuccess( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests/event/ >>>>>>> observer/context/enterprise/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> staticMethod/Printer.java) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.event. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> observer.context.enterprise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> staticMethod.Student.printSuccess(Student.java:33) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who might be able to help a bit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could also do a hangout session to hang over the >>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>> together. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done this yesterday with Reinhard Sandtner to fix a >>> few >>>>>>>>>>>> Extension >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bugs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 10:38 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes yank the profile if not usable and if no one >>>> should >>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>> it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then we should at least add a README? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or at least document that profile in the pom. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-01-31 9:34 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I thought something similar when trashing 2 >>>> hours >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> try >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB generator running. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to figure it might be broken beyond >>> repair... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks that you at least confirm this view and >>>> spare >>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 2 options on the table >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.) Do a quick hack and add the <trim/> support >>>>>>>>> directly in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.) Invest more time and fix the JAXB source >>>> generator >>>>>>>>>>>> setup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No point today to do it. Can be worse keeping it >>> as >>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future specs if needed but not for existing one >>>> IMHO. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm tempted to go 1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But of course I'm happy if someone finds a bit >>>> time to >>>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generator >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David, you did this initially. Is it worth it and >>>> can >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time for it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 31.01.2018 um 09:20 schrieb Romain >>> Manni-Bucau >>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For simple updates like that I tend to update >>> the >>>> sax >>>>>>>>>>>> parser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (that's what we did for JSF since most of the >>>> model >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> handled by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For CDI we are supposed to still use JAXB (since >>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>> can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beans.xml): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>> tomee/blob/master/container/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb-core/src/main/java/ >>>> org/apache/openejb/config/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ReadDescriptors.java#L681 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>> | >>>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ >>> rmannibucau >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-01-31 8:17 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've come down to just 18 failing tests in >>>>>>>>>>>> tck/cdi-embedded. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of them are EE related (missing privileges >>>>>>>>>>>> exceptions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one left with the CDI integration: >>>> <trim/> >>>>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This needs a change in the beans.xml schema. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've added the changes and moved to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> container/openejb-jee/src/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main/resources/META-INF/schema/beans_2_0.xsd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But now I totally fail to generate the JAXB >>>> sources. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've found the maven profile to start the >>>> generator, >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an Exception. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone able to help out? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The work is done in fb_tomee8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, I also tried the attached patch to move to >>>>>>> valid >>>>>>>>>>>> urls >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
