I've backported the changes to OWB 1.2.x and 1.7.x. I'll give these a check with Java 9 and then I'll send those PRs and move on to the OpenJPA. Then I'll start the release.
Jon On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < [email protected]> wrote: > Cool, thanks Mark. Looks like I might have a few updates to do :-) > > Jon > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Jon! >> >> Txs for updating and looking forward for the OWB patch. >> Btw, we also might update OpenJPA. It also uses xbean-asm5 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 06.03.2018 um 10:22 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]>: >> > >> > +1, thanks Jon. >> > >> > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8- >> high-performance> >> > >> > 2018-03-06 10:17 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Gallimore < >> [email protected]> >> > : >> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> I applied a change to move to ASM 6 in master and 1.7.x (actually >> >> backported from TomEE 8 - thanks Mark!). For those wondering what all >> this >> >> is about, this change allows classes compiled with Java 9 to scanned. >> >> However, this led to two versions of xbean asm being included in the >> binary >> >> as OpenWebBeans was using the previous version. >> >> >> >> For now, I have backed that out, and I'll see if I can apply the >> >> appropriate patches to OpenWebBeans contribute those and see if I can >> >> re-apply these changes over here. >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> >
